<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Shizzle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lenni.info/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lenni.info/blog</link>
	<description>My little notebook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 07:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Ruby 1.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pengolin (without RVM) by Leonard</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2012/05/installing-ruby-1-9-3-on-ubuntu-12-04-precise-pengolin/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 07:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=683#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>After installing the Ruby interpreter itself I usually let rubygems handle all further dependencies, so you&#039;ll probably want to do a &lt;code&gt;sudo gem install bundler&lt;/code&gt;. Make sure that you have gem pointing at gem1.9.1 not gem1.8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After installing the Ruby interpreter itself I usually let rubygems handle all further dependencies, so you&#8217;ll probably want to do a <code>sudo gem install bundler</code>. Make sure that you have gem pointing at gem1.9.1 not gem1.8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Ruby 1.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pengolin (without RVM) by Carlos</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2012/05/installing-ruby-1-9-3-on-ubuntu-12-04-precise-pengolin/comment-page-1/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=683#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>Hi, thanks for your post.
I also need to run &quot;bundle update&quot; but if I try doing 
&quot;sudo apt-get install ruby-bundler&quot; it depends on &quot;libreadline5 libruby1.8 ruby ruby1.8&quot;
Any idea on making it work with ruby 1.9 ?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, thanks for your post.<br />
I also need to run &#8220;bundle update&#8221; but if I try doing<br />
&#8220;sudo apt-get install ruby-bundler&#8221; it depends on &#8220;libreadline5 libruby1.8 ruby ruby1.8&#8243;<br />
Any idea on making it work with ruby 1.9 ?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Ruby 1.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pengolin (without RVM) by Leonard</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2012/05/installing-ruby-1-9-3-on-ubuntu-12-04-precise-pengolin/comment-page-1/#comment-1551</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 08:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=683#comment-1551</guid>
		<description>Yeah, if you don&#039;t have ruby1.8 installed you don&#039;t need to do update-alternatives. I can&#039;t remember if there is any ruby installed by default. Seems a while since I set up that server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, if you don&#8217;t have ruby1.8 installed you don&#8217;t need to do update-alternatives. I can&#8217;t remember if there is any ruby installed by default. Seems a while since I set up that server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Ruby 1.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pengolin (without RVM) by bnf</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2012/05/installing-ruby-1-9-3-on-ubuntu-12-04-precise-pengolin/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>bnf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=683#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>Great, thanks.

Note that if installing Ruby on a new machine (without 1.8 installed) it doesn’t look like you need to run any of the update-alternatives commands. Easy as pie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, thanks.</p>
<p>Note that if installing Ruby on a new machine (without 1.8 installed) it doesn’t look like you need to run any of the update-alternatives commands. Easy as pie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Ruby 1.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pengolin (without RVM) by Leonard</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2012/05/installing-ruby-1-9-3-on-ubuntu-12-04-precise-pengolin/comment-page-1/#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 08:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=683#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>If you haven&#039;t uninstalled the ruby package just do this again:

sudo update-alternatives --config ruby
sudo update-alternatives --config gem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t uninstalled the ruby package just do this again:</p>
<p>sudo update-alternatives &#8211;config ruby<br />
sudo update-alternatives &#8211;config gem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Ruby 1.9.2 on Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot without using RVM by Daniel Blair</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2011/12/installing-ruby-1-9-2-on-ubuntu-11-10-oneric-ocelot-without-using-rvm/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 19:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=582#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>aptitude -y install ruby1.9.3 rubygems1.9.1
ruby -v
ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30 revision 33570) [i686-linux]

Does the trick.  If you leave off the 1.9.1 on rubygems then ruby 1.8 is installed, which I don&#039;t want.

Your post did help me resolve the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aptitude -y install ruby1.9.3 rubygems1.9.1<br />
ruby -v<br />
ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30 revision 33570) [i686-linux]</p>
<p>Does the trick.  If you leave off the 1.9.1 on rubygems then ruby 1.8 is installed, which I don&#8217;t want.</p>
<p>Your post did help me resolve the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Ruby 1.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pengolin (without RVM) by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2012/05/installing-ruby-1-9-3-on-ubuntu-12-04-precise-pengolin/comment-page-1/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 10:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=683#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>How to bring back ruby 1.8?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to bring back ruby 1.8?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Ruby 1.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pengolin (without RVM) by Rob</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2012/05/installing-ruby-1-9-3-on-ubuntu-12-04-precise-pengolin/comment-page-1/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 03:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=683#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>Hey thanks so much for sharing this post!  I had bought a great rails tutorial book, and they suggested using linux for rails development, so I switched back into good ol Ubuntu and just couldnt figure out what was holding me back from updating to 1.9.3....

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey thanks so much for sharing this post!  I had bought a great rails tutorial book, and they suggested using linux for rails development, so I switched back into good ol Ubuntu and just couldnt figure out what was holding me back from updating to 1.9.3&#8230;.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Ruby 1.9.2 on Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot without using RVM by Installing Ruby 1.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pengolin (without RVM) &#8211; Shizzle</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2011/12/installing-ruby-1-9-2-on-ubuntu-11-10-oneric-ocelot-without-using-rvm/comment-page-1/#comment-1544</link>
		<dc:creator>Installing Ruby 1.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pengolin (without RVM) &#8211; Shizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=582#comment-1544</guid>
		<description>[...] as I have elaborated out in a previous post getting the Ruby 1.9 series on Ubuntu without using RVM instead of 1.8 isn&#8217;t all that easy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as I have elaborated out in a previous post getting the Ruby 1.9 series on Ubuntu without using RVM instead of 1.8 isn&#8217;t all that easy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Configuring the Maven Site Plugin to accept scp-URLs for site:deploy by Eddie</title>
		<link>http://lenni.info/blog/2011/04/configuring-the-maven-site-plugin-to-accept-scp-urls-for-sitedeploy/comment-page-1/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenni.info/blog/?p=461#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>&quot;In hindsight the solution wasn’t all that complicated but it threw me a little because Maven is usually quite good at pulling all its required dependencies.&quot;

True, but this is a documented decision:  https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-compatibility-notes.html

&quot;
Unlike Maven 2, Maven 3 supports out of the box only http:, https: and file: as transport protocols. To use other transport protocols like scp:, the appropriate wagons have to be explicitly declared in the POM as a build extension. If the wagon in question is only used for deployment to a repository, it can alternatively be declared as a dependency of the Maven Deploy Plugin.
&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In hindsight the solution wasn’t all that complicated but it threw me a little because Maven is usually quite good at pulling all its required dependencies.&#8221;</p>
<p>True, but this is a documented decision:  <a href="https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-compatibility-notes.html" rel="nofollow">https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-compatibility-notes.html</a></p>
<p>&#8221;<br />
Unlike Maven 2, Maven 3 supports out of the box only http:, https: and file: as transport protocols. To use other transport protocols like scp:, the appropriate wagons have to be explicitly declared in the POM as a build extension. If the wagon in question is only used for deployment to a repository, it can alternatively be declared as a dependency of the Maven Deploy Plugin.<br />
&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

